Oddly enough, this is probably an area best left to the judges, partly because the circumstances, in a world of globally expanding multinational and transnational corporations and organisations, are bound to give rise to many cases where the alleged gross negligence could be attributed to senior managers abroad or in the United Kingdom. I am horrified to mention the BP case again, but it illustrates the possibilities. At this stage of globalisation, we would probably not get it right if we tried to deal with jurisdiction in this Bill—except in the case of noble Lords whose imaginations were much wider than mine. There are already provisions on jurisdiction, which the courts apply, and they may or may not be sufficient; but we would have to think about jurisdiction in that much wider context. If noble Lords disagree, then by all means let us come back to it on Report and get something that is exactly right.
Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Wedderburn of Charlton
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 18 January 2007.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
688 c302GC Session
2006-07Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 12:48:32 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_370681
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_370681
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_370681