I thank the noble Lord for that response. I am not sure that we can take the matter much further. He took us very carefully through most of Clause 8, although he did not underline the fact that subsection (4) states: "““This section does not prevent the jury from having regard to any other matters they consider relevant””."
I suspect that whether we put in or take out ““attitudes”” and whether we leave in or take out ““motives”” makes very little difference. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
[Amendment No. 78A not moved.]
Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Henley
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 17 January 2007.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
688 c274GC Session
2006-07Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 12:49:00 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_370054
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_370054
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_370054