moved Amendment No. 64:
64: Clause 6, page 6, line 1, leave out subsections (3) and (4)
The noble Lord said: In moving AmendmentNo. 64 I shall speak also to Amendment No. 69. Yet again, these are amendments tabled to discover what the Government intended in bringing forward amendments on Report in another place. I understand that those amendments were added after the debate in Committee on the emergency services provisions in the Bill and it is unfortunate that again the Government did not give themselves enough time to explain the considerable redrafting of the clause.
The amendments have, I believe, improved the clause by identifying where exemptions do and do not apply and I am pleased that the Government have taken on board the comments of my honourable friend in another place, the shadow Attorney-General, Mr Dominic Grieve, who pointed out the potential for confusion within hospitals in both accident and emergency departments and treatment departments. All I seek in moving the amendment is to have an assurance from the Minister that there will not now be such confusion. I beg to move.
Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Henley
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 17 January 2007.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
688 c258GC Session
2006-07Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 12:47:10 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_370026
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_370026
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_370026