Perhaps I may respond, as a mere solicitor, to two exceedingly senior noble and learned Lords, and apply the Lyell test whereby you put the word ““in”” before the word in question. An ““insignificant”” part of an organisation’s activities would be readily understood, but what on earth would an ““insubstantial”” part of its activities be? ““Substantial”” is a dangerously vague word, with at least two different meanings. Obviously, we will await the Minister’s words of wisdom.
I keep trying to apply what I am now going to call the ““James test””: when one looks at the practical examples that my noble friend gave, will one catch the right people in the right place, and who are the right people? That is a huge question, and I do not know whether my noble friend wants to comment on it in relation to the example that he gave earlier.
Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Hunt of Wirral
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 11 January 2007.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
688 c148GC Session
2006-07Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 12:44:58 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_368147
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_368147
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_368147