Perhaps I can assist in this matter. I think I heard the noble Lord, Lord Wedderburn, say as an aside to his noble friend Lady Turner that this was not a matter of law but purely of language. The noble Lord then gave what I think we would all agree was a great lawyer’s speech. If we can get back to the language that the lawyers—particularly my noble and learned friend—have used, it is obvious that deleting ““far””, as the noble Baroness suggests, would mean that virtually any active negligence would lead to liability for prosecution. That seems excessive. I therefore hope that the Government will stick with their wording and not be seduced by the suggestion of the noble Baroness and those who support her that the word ““far”” be removed.
Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Henley
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 11 January 2007.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
688 c143GC Session
2006-07Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 12:49:10 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_368134
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_368134
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_368134