I really cannot accept the noble and learned Lord’s point, which would apply equally to Clause 1(3). As I indicated to the noble and learned Lord, Lord Lyell, we are simply deleting subsection (3) and providing a different test. It has nothing to do with the definition of gross negligence; it is to do with the additional requirement that has to apply for corporate manslaughter to apply in a particular situation. I accept that the drafting may not be felicitous, but the noble and learned Lord is not correct about the point that we are making.
Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Razzall
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 11 January 2007.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
688 c128GC Session
2006-07Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 12:47:08 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_368102
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_368102
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_368102