I draw attention to Amendment No. 7, which a number of bodies have asked us to consider. It would not confine liability to circumstances when an organisation is guilty because of the way in which its activities are, "““managed or organised by its senior management””,"
but would spread liability more widely. We need to explore this very carefully, with an open mind, because it is not as obvious as it sometimes seems to people whether someone junior in an organisation—in other words, someone other than senior management who makes a serious mistake that leads to death—is grossly negligent. Unless there is some gross negligence in how that person was organised by senior management, I am not sure that it would be right to place on the organisation liability for corporate manslaughter. There is a tradition and a sound legal principle to be found in a famous case of a trading standards officer, whose name will come to me in a moment, whereby, provided that senior management have shown that they have carried out their functions properly, an error by junior management does not render the whole organisation liable. We should depart from that only after very careful thought.
Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Lyell of Markyate
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 11 January 2007.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
688 c127GC Session
2006-07Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 12:46:58 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_368097
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_368097
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_368097