With regard to the list in Schedule 1, perhaps with the exception of the Prison Service and where local authorities are responsible for children or young people but where one can see that deaths have occurred and might properly come within this provision, it is not immediately apparent where some of these public bodies would ever be likely to be guilty of corporate manslaughter, even if they were incorporated. Defra, for example, is one of the bodies listed. I was racking my brains to think of circumstances when its officials or those employed by the department might negligently handle equipment and so on, give rise to deaths and thus—at least, in theory—render Defra liable. Can the Minister explain one or two of the thoughts of principle—that is what I was hoping to tease out from him earlier—which justify the restriction of these bodies’ liability only to their position as employers or as occupiers of land? Should they handle activities badly and kill someone, what principle would cause them to be exempt?
Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Lyell of Markyate
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 11 January 2007.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
688 c122GC Session
2006-07Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 12:47:11 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_368085
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_368085
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_368085