Our Committee’s view was that if one could charge someone with acts preparatory to terrorism under the new legislation, believing that one would be able to do more than that, that would clearly be fine, but the other end of the spectrum—charging someone for not having lights on their bicycle—would not be acceptable. The difficult area perhaps—this does occur—is whether it would be acceptable to charge someone and detain them for, say, immigration offences, which could affect a large number of other people but would not necessarily lead to a terrorism charge. Our feeling was that if the offence was directly related to the terrorism, that is fine, but if one is on a fishing expedition to find something else with which to charge someone as a reason for detaining them, one is getting into a difficult and, at best, a grey area.
Terrorism (Detention and Human Rights)
Proceeding contribution from
John Denham
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Thursday, 7 December 2006.
It occurred during Adjournment debate on Terrorism (Detention and Human Rights).
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
454 c183-4WH;454 c181-2WH Session
2006-07Chamber / Committee
Westminster HallSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 12:57:46 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_364322
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_364322
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_364322