I do not want to put too many words into the mouths of my Committee members, who did not necessarily address the issues explicitly, so I shall put forward my view. We probably need to be sufficiently imaginative to understand how some of the strengths of the continental systems can be adapted to our legal traditions. I do not propose a full panoply of investigating judges and all the rest of it, but it would be valuable to consider whether there is a category of judge that would be capable of taking an independent legal view on some operational decisions. We can construct such processes in our tradition. The moves, highlighted in the Joint Committee’s report, towards the development of a specialist section of the Crown Prosecution Service, concentrating on attempting to ensure that we secure terrorist convictions, begin to point us in that direction. It would not be wholesale importation of a system through the channel tunnel, but learning lessons and asking, ““How do we do this in a British manner?””
Terrorism (Detention and Human Rights)
Proceeding contribution from
John Denham
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Thursday, 7 December 2006.
It occurred during Adjournment debate on Terrorism (Detention and Human Rights).
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
454 c157WH;454 c155WH Session
2006-07Chamber / Committee
Westminster HallSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 12:57:38 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_364286
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_364286
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_364286