Returning to my earlier intervention, that situation coloured the entire debate because it was obvious to those of us who made inquiries at the time that the ACPO case was not well researched and that its key committee had been divided on whether the submission to the Government, on which the Government subsequently relied, was a good one. Anyone who bothered to make inquiries round the back about what had gone on quickly discovered that the Government were relying on what appeared to be a flawed case. That in itself was not helpful in achieving the rational debate that we needed.
Terrorism (Detention and Human Rights)
Proceeding contribution from
Dominic Grieve
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Thursday, 7 December 2006.
It occurred during Adjournment debate on Terrorism (Detention and Human Rights).
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
454 c155WH;454 c153WH Session
2006-07Chamber / Committee
Westminster HallSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 12:57:38 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_364281
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_364281
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_364281