My Lords, I thought I had dealt with that in my speech by quoting from Article 7.1 of the European Convention on Extradition. It is quite clear that the amendment we have tabled is based on that. It is also a provision within the Irish treaty with the United States. The Irish have entered into a treaty with the United States and many aspects of that treaty are similar to our own; but what the Irish have done is to provide the forum defence whereby if a judge, not a prosecutor, thinks it is in the interests of justice for the trial to take place in Ireland rather than the United States, the judge is entitled to take that decision. In my respectful submission, that is the right approach.
I thank all noble Lords who have participated in this debate. I continue to believe that the position we have taken by tabling this amendment is the right one and I wish to test the opinion of the House.
On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. D1) shall be agreed to?
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 189; Not-Contents, 152.
71: Schedule 2, page 83, line 1, leave out paragraphs 26 to 28
The Commons disagree to this Amendment and propose the following Amendments to the words so restored to the Bill-
71A: Page 83, leave out line 8
71B: Page 83, line 9, leave out from ““force”” to end of line 10
71C: Page 83, leave out line 16
71D: Page 83, line 17, leave out from ““force”” to end of line 18
71E: Page 84, line 7, at end insert-
““( ) The Secretary of State shall not give a direction under this section unless Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Constabulary has been given-
(a) the same information about the grounds for proposing to give that direction as is required to be given under subsection (4)(a) (or would be so required but for subsection (5)); and
(b) an opportunity of making written observations about those grounds.
The Secretary of State shall publish any such observations in such manner as appears to him to be appropriate.””
71F: Page 84, leave out lines 8 to 14
71G: Page 84, line 15, leave out ““chief officer of police or””
71H: Page 84, leave out lines 17 to 23
71I: Page 85, line 16, at end insert-
““( ) The Secretary of State shall not give a direction under this section unless Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Constabulary has been given-
(a) the same information about the grounds for proposing to give that direction as is required to be given under subsection (4)(a) (or would be so required but for subsection (5)); and
(b) an opportunity of making written observations about those grounds.
The Secretary of State shall publish any such observations in such manner as appears to him to be appropriate.””
71J: Page 85, leave out lines 32 to 35 and insert-
““(a) the Association of Police Authorities;
(b) the Association of Chief Police Officers; and””
71K: Page 85, line 45, leave out from beginning to end of line 2 on page 46
Police and Justice Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Kingsland
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 1 November 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Police and Justice Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
686 c303-6 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 21:11:16 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_357462
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_357462
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_357462