moved Amendment No. 156G:"Page 65, line 24, leave out paragraph (f) and insert—"
““(f) his becoming aware of the loss of his travel authorisation;””
The noble Lord said: Government Amendment No. 159 to Schedule 2 makes it a condition of all banning orders that individuals subject to a banning order are required to provide details to the Football Banning Orders Authority—the FBOA—of any relevant change in personal circumstances that will make it more difficult for the enforcing authority to monitor and administer the banning order. This is to ensure that individuals subject to orders are unable to avoid, intentionally or otherwise, compliance with the conditions of their order because of a change in name, address or passport details or due to their using a previously undisclosed name.
Amendments Nos. 156G, 158 and 162 revise the definition of a banned individual’s travel documentation from ““passport”” to ““travel authorisation””. This will avoid the need to amend primary legislation in the event of any change in the current arrangements. I beg to move.
On Question, amendment agreed to.
[Amendment No. 157 had been withdrawn from the Marshalled List.]
Violent Crime Reduction Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Bassam of Brighton
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 22 May 2006.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Violent Crime Reduction Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
682 c669-70 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 13:56:18 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_324977
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_324977
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_324977