UK Parliament / Open data

Police and Justice Bill

Proceeding contribution from Owen Paterson (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 10 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bills on Police and Justice Bill.
My hon. Friend is quite right—there will chaos when the proposal is introduced. On the television last night, my chief constable made the point that there will be only one winner. There will be only one chief constable and one deputy, so four good deputies and four good chief constables will be fired. The police will lose a huge swathe of experience across the country, as chief constables, their deputies and other senior personnel such as financial staff will go. It is an extraordinary act of vandalism to get rid of that talent, given that SOCA, which should handle level 2 crime, only began its operations April, and that forces such as West Mercia have proved that they can handle level 2 crime. This is a bizarre story, as the hon. Member for Stockton, North said. The measure was rushed through at a week’s notice on the basis of a bogus report and utterly false statistics that have been rubbished. It will be rammed through in my area in the face of extraordinary public opinion—I have cited opposition of 94 and 96 per cent. It lacks legitimacy and it has been rammed through in the teeth of professional advice from the most successful chief constable in the country and from police chairmen, who have made it clear that they will take legal action against the Government. To suggest that it can be introduced without a local referendum is insane, so I support amendment No. 82.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

446 c353 

Session

2005-06

Chamber / Committee

House of Commons chamber
Back to top