UK Parliament / Open data

Police and Justice Bill

Proceeding contribution from Owen Paterson (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 10 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bills on Police and Justice Bill.
No, the professor’s analysis was purely of the HMIC report. Given that it is constantly thrown at us as the justification for a revolution in British policing, it is pertinent that a politically neutral professor of statistics rubbishes the data. Even though he uses such extraordinarily colourful language, the Government continue to produce that report as evidence. Given that basic evidence and given that it is extremely unpopular, the proposal is illegitimate. The Prime Minister said before the Liaison Committee:"““the reorganisation of local police is something where it really is sensible to listen to local people.””" On 18 January, he said:"““It is important that we listen to local people, and I can assure the hon. Gentleman that we will do so.””—[Official Report, 18 January 2006; Vol. 441, c. 836.]" A week later, on 25 January, he said:"““Obviously, we will listen carefully to what people say." Later that day, he said:"““I entirely accept that some people are in favour of mergers, that some are against them and that some are in between. We will have to take a decision on what is best for local forces, but we will do so listening to what local people say. In the end, surely, what we both want to see is the most effective form of policing.””—[Official Report, 25 January 2006; Vol. 441, c. 1426-29.]" A comprehensive survey of public opinion has taken place in West Mercia. Not one of the area’s 13 Members of Parliament wrote to the police authority to support the regional proposal, including a Parliamentary Private Secretary, the hon. Member for Worcester (Mr. Foster), who is now a Government Whip and, lo and behold, the right hon. Member for Redditch (Jacqui Smith), the Government Chief Whip. None of the county and unitary councils supports the measure, and neither do any of the nine district councils. None of the 108 parish and town councils support it, and neither do the 11 police consultative groups or 15 community groups. They all support the proposal that West Mercia should become a strategic force, achieving that rank using its own resources. In more than 100 public meetings, overwhelming support has been expressed for the proposal that West Mercia handle level 2 crimes. In a telephone poll, 94 per cent. of respondents were in favour of West Mercia promoting itself to level 2 within its own boundaries. Similarly, 96 per cent. of written responses supported West Mercia as a level 2 force. Why on earth do the Government think that the proposal, if it is rammed through, will be legitimate? The Minister effectively said that carefully selected Government toadies will have a little debate in a closed Statutory Instrument Committee, to enable the measure to go through.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

446 c351-2 

Session

2005-06

Chamber / Committee

House of Commons chamber
Back to top