The Minister has mentioned the Home Secretary’s role a couple of times. As we know, the Home Secretary represents a Scottish seat, and has no remit for policing in Scotland.
Interestingly, a vigorous debate took place in the Labour party in Scotland. A party insider said"““We want police forces to be more accountable to the communities they serve.””"
The breaking up of Strathclyde police is being discussed where the Home Secretary has no remit. Then the Home Secretary comes down to England and tells our constituents, who massively oppose larger police forces, that they may be given them.
What is the Home Secretary’s real opinion? On his home patch, his own party is debating the breaking up of a very large police force. Now he has come down here—he has only been in power over the past few days—and I should like to know his real views. Is he going to listen to us? Is he going to listen to our constituents? Is he going to let people have a referendum where there is huge local opposition to this measure?
Police and Justice Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Owen Paterson
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 10 May 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Police and Justice Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
446 c326 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 21:52:37 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_322397
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_322397
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_322397