The amendment would replace Clause 8(4). That provides that provision for the making or hearing of an application for an interim order must be made by the court, for proceedings in the county court, or the justices’ clerk for applications to a magistrates’ court. Instead, the amendment proposes that permission of a court be required for interim orders for those made without notice or in the absence of the individual.
However, the amendment does not reflect the different court procedures that should be adopted in the magistrates’ court from the county court, where permissions are required for the making or hearing of an application or for an interim banning order. That difference needs to be specified in the Bill. For that reason, we cannot encourage the Committee to press the amendments.
Violent Crime Reduction Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Bassam of Brighton
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 26 April 2006.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Violent Crime Reduction Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
681 c196 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 13:54:04 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_317600
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_317600
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_317600