As I said to the hon. Gentleman in Committee, we intend the Bill to improve the welfare of greyhounds. Indeed, the welfare offence will improve not only greyhounds’ welfare but that of all animals before any regulation is introduced under secondary legislative powers. We have not ruled out regulating greyhound tracks if self-regulation proves not to work. As I said in Committee, we are keen to try to bring that process forward from 2010 if possible. I simply repeat that it is not the Gambling Commission’s role to regulate animal welfare. That is why we believe that the amendment is perhaps not the most sensible way of proceeding.
Did the hon. Member for The Wrekin wish to intervene?
Animal Welfare Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Ben Bradshaw
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 14 March 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Animal Welfare Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
443 c1408 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 10:48:57 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_307910
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_307910
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_307910