UK Parliament / Open data

Animal Welfare Bill

Proceeding contribution from Peter Atkinson (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 14 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bills on Animal Welfare Bill.
The answer to the hon. Gentleman’s point is that the evidence is not conclusive on either side, which is why we should leave this to individuals. It is also why I believe that the hunting ban is wrong. People should make their own mind up on these issues. Another reason for my voting against is that we are in danger of producing bad legislation. Goodness knows, the Hunting Bill was a bad enough muddle; this Bill will be a muddle even if it contains an exemption for gun dogs. I asked the Minister early in his speech what would happen if I acquired a dog with a docked tail, born after the legislation had come into force, and I could not produce any microchip evidence or a certificate from the vet. I could just say, ““Well, guv, an Irishman sold it to me at a fair.”” It might be a stray or I might have got it from a man in a pub. As the hon. Member for Stroud (Mr. Drew) said, it is easy for people to dock their own dogs. It is estimated that there are 1 million docked dogs in this country and very few vets that do it. Even today, there must be quite a number of illegally docked dogs. It will be easy to get round the legislation.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

443 c1351-2 

Session

2005-06

Chamber / Committee

House of Commons chamber
Back to top