UK Parliament / Open data

Electoral Administration Bill

The noble Baroness, Lady Hanham, makes a valid point, but if we remove Clause 4, it is not permissive. That is the point and why I am concerned. A future government might take this as a signal that this is not an appropriate responsibility for a public body and they might want to privatise it. As the Minister said earlier, computer schemes in the public sector have not been wild successes, but nor have schemes in the private sector—of course, it is often the same consultants giving advice on both with an equal lack of success. If a future government, perhaps of a different colour, decided that this was a suitable responsibility for a private organisation, I would be filled with horror. The commission is prepared to take on this responsibility; it has made clear how it would operate as CORE keeper and that it would be accountable and answerable to Parliament through the Speaker’s Committee. I simply ask what other organisation the noble Baroness has in mind.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

679 c109-10GC 

Session

2005-06

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords Grand Committee
Back to top