In terms of efficiency, yes, but it is not a body that understands electoral processes.
The new clause also provides that the body designated to evaluate the scheme,"““shall report on . . . the extent to which the scheme has improved the accuracy and integrity of electoral registers . . . and the security of the holding of the data by electronic means””."
Given the aim of the Bill, the inclusion of those criteria is important—indeed, it is essential.
My concern with CORE schemes is in regard to means, not ends. We need to get the means right. I am seeking to tighten up the provisions to ensure that we get the means right and to prevent us rushing into a scheme that may not be fit for purpose. I agree with my noble friends that we need greater clarity in terms of what is proposed, and this new scheme is designed as a modest contribution to achieving that. I beg to move.
Electoral Administration Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Norton of Louth
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 28 February 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Electoral Administration Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
679 c105-6GC Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:14:01 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_303454
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_303454
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_303454