It is indeed. The point that I am making is that the Electoral Commission ““may”” be designated—it does not have to be—but it is ideally qualified to undertake such an evaluation as well as to keep the operation of the scheme under review. As Harriet Harman noted in the other place, another body could be a CORE keeper, but I am not sure that it would have the expertise to match that of the commission in evaluating electoral processes. I have not noticed the National Audit Office develop expertise in that respect.
Electoral Administration Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Norton of Louth
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 28 February 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Electoral Administration Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
679 c105GC Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:36:41 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_303452
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_303452
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_303452