I am a bit worried about the Minister’s response. Paragraph 2 of the introduction to the consultation paper says:"““The project, which is being managed by the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister . . . will provide one of the essential building blocks on which multi-channel, e-enabled elections will be built by helping to modernise the electoral registration process in Great Britain””."
I accept that that is not the Minister’s department, but, as the document goes on to say, the project,"““is co-sponsored by the Department for Constitutional Affairs””."
Is the Minister saying that to move to the scenario outlined in the consultation paper there would have to be separate legislation? A scheme is being proposed but we do not know what it is. If it is limited only to the protection or amalgamation of a lot of electoral registers that are being kept for no purpose, that does not seem a frightfully good use of either time or money. We can bring electoral registers together but there must be a purpose in doing so. The purpose is clear in the Bill—it is to move on from having local registers to being able to hold elections in other ways. I hesitate even to look as though I am contradicting the noble Baroness, but we need to unpick this.
Electoral Administration Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Hanham
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 28 February 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Electoral Administration Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
679 c73GC Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:36:53 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_303370
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_303370
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_303370