I thank the noble Baroness for her reply and her contention that this is a standard practice. Perhaps it is the nature of good governance, but it appears to be a belt and braces exercise in the normal way the Audit Commission and other bodies will be looking at it. Perhaps this provision is to provide powers for the department also to do its own exercise. In the mean time, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Schedule 2, as amended, agreed to.
Clause 18 [Commission’s general purpose]:
[Amendments Nos. 241 to 248 not moved.]
Clause 18 agreed to.
Clause 19 [Representation, advice and monitoring]:
Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Duke of Montrose
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 8 February 2006.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
678 c711 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 12:44:04 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_299024
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_299024
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_299024