I support the noble Baroness’s amendment, not necessarily in detail, but certainly in concept. The Committee will agree that at least a large portion of the selling of the 2012 Olympics was the legacy. However—this is where I part company slightly from the noble Baroness—the legacy must not be only in London; it must be nationwide and include sport as well as infrastructure. It would be helpful if we had a skeleton plan, even if it is in the form of regulations, that lays down some objectives for the ODA—and LOCOG where it comes into it—about what the nation expects as a legacy.
London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Glentoran
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 2 February 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
678 c218GC Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:28:29 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_297688
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_297688
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_297688