moved Amendment No. 42:"Page 7, line 17, after ““London”” insert—"
““( ) the Olympic Delivery Authority,””
The noble Lord said: This is another probing amendment because I think that the Government have been a little coy in drafting this part of the Bill. Clause 9 deals with the dissolution of the authority. The authority is established for a particular function and we all accept that it will be dissolved. Subsection (3) states:"““Before making an order””,"
which is required to dissolve the authority—"““ . . . the Secretary of State shall consult . . . the Mayor of London””—"
I understand that—"““[and] such other persons as the Secretary of State thinks appropriate””."
It is remarkable to draft such a subsection. In effect, it deals with ending the work of a lot of people without including in the list of consultees the people most directly concerned—the authority. I am sure that the Minister will tell me that it was always intended that the authority would be consulted. I cannot believe that this could possibly be done without such consultation. As I said, I think that the Government were being a little coy in drafting the clause, and I tabled the amendment simply to clarify that that good intent was there. I beg to move.
London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Dixon-Smith
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 2 February 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
678 c195-6GC Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:05:51 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_297641
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_297641
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_297641