Amendments Nos. 40 and 41, tabled in my name, are part of this group. Amendment No. 41 might appear to go against what the noble Lord, Lord Glentoran, said, but I am searching for clarity rather than making a point of principle. Schedule 2(4) provides that:"““A transfer scheme . . . may dispense with a requirement for consent (whether arising from an enactment, an instrument or an agreement)””."
My amendment refers to Clause 8(8)(b), which relates to the consent of the Mayor of London; in other words, can it be confirmed that the schedule does not override that clause?
Amendment No. 40 relates to paragraph 3(2)(c) of Schedule 2, which provides that a transfer can be made,"““on financial or other terms””."
The amendment inserts the word ““agreed”” because I thought that I had seen some reference to dispute resolution but then I could not find it. Perhaps the Minister can remind us how this will work. Is it a matter of the Secretary of State’s direction again or is there something in here about reaching agreement?
London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Hamwee
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 2 February 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
678 c193-4GC Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:43:16 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_297636
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_297636
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_297636