I am not trying to be a killjoy, but it is possible that a year or two before the games the budget will be rather stretched. Paragraph (c), which the amendment of the noble Lord, Lord Dixon-Smith, would delete, permits the ODA to fund litter clearing and street lighting anywhere in the UK provided that there is one person travelling from that location to the games. Would my noble friend accept instead a maximum geographical radius from any games venue? I am looking after his budget for him, and I hope he accepts that this is very important.
London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Berkeley
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 2 February 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
678 c190GC Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:28:07 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_297623
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_297623
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_297623