moved Amendment No. 11:"Page 34, line 20, leave out ““is involved”” and insert ““has an interest””"
The noble Baroness said: I make it absolutely clear from the outset that this is a probing amendment. Amendment No. 11 seeks to amend the schedule. Paragraph 20 states:"““A member or employee of the Authority who is involved in—"
I seek to understand the words ““is involved””—"““the exercise of the Authority’s functions in relation to land may not participate in deliberations or decisions of the Authority acting as a local planning authority in relation to that land””."
Of course, I accept the importance of separating the land functions from the planning functions. However, the term ““is involved”” seems to me rather wide. I might have expected the term ““have an interest in””, though that may be too narrow. I want to give the Minister an opportunity to explain the provision, which may seek to replicate arrangements in local government as closely as possible. I hope that the Minister will explain whether the word ““involved”” is capable of being interpreted in a very wide sense, or whether one would need to be very closely bound up with the relevant matter to fall foul of the provision. I beg to move.
London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Hamwee
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 31 January 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
678 c89-90GC Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:35:33 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_296512
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_296512
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_296512