I am sure that my noble friend Lady Hamwee will deal with the substance of the Minister’s remarks. However, I want to return to the detailed structural points he made, for which I thank him. He made it clear several times—indeed, the Olympic staging structures chart makes it clear—that the chairman of the ODA, Mr Lemley, will be only an observer; he will have no representation on the board, yet the Minister, throughout his remarks, has made clear the importance of the role of the ODA.
Getting the structures right at the beginning is crucial and I do not understand why observer status has been granted to the chairman of the ODA and not full membership of the board. As the Minister said, the Olympic board is responsible for oversight and monitoring of the entire Olympic project. Surely, having the chair of the ODA on the board as a full member would be a more effective way of doing that.
London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Clement-Jones
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 31 January 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
678 c72GC Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:59:57 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_296484
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_296484
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_296484