Does the hon. Gentleman agree that the wording of the Committee’s conclusions is incredibly weak? It refers to"““Taking into consideration evidence to the Committee, informal feedback from the public””,"
and that was a Labour amendment. In other words, the evidence before the Committee was completely inadequate, so we are talking about the extra-sensory perception that somehow managed to find its way before the Committee.
Government of Wales Bill
Proceeding contribution from
David Jones
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 30 January 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Government of Wales Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
442 c106 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 10:06:46 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_295478
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_295478
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_295478