I shall just deal with that point, because that has been a bit of a recurring theme this afternoon. I do not honestly think it tenable to hold to the point that the Treasury can deal with such matters in a capricious way, simply changing its mind. The basis of the retrospective regulations flows from the Statement in 2004. A fair reading of that makes it clear what type of arrangements it seeks to deal with. Just a change of mind on existing schemes that have been specifically incentivised by legislation would not be caught by that. It is not fair to suggest that, simply by whim, the position would be reversed. It is anchored very much in the Statement. What the Statement was intended to cover is abundantly clear.
National Insurance Contributions Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord McKenzie of Luton
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 26 January 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on National Insurance Contributions Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
677 c395GC Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:23:17 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_295002
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_295002
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_295002