My noble friend Lord Skelmersdale and the noble Lord, Lord Newby, have more than adequately poured scorn on the idea that affirmative regulations are some kind of protection and that the parliamentary processes in the House of Commons on the Finance Bill are also a form of protection. I shall carefully note the references in the Official Report in regard to what the noble Lord has said, because I know that I shall need them when he is on the other side of the House.
The Minister made a number of arguments. He overstated the amount of tax that would be at risk if this modest group of amendments were agreed to. The annual effect could not possibly be the whole £240 million, as has been claimed. That assumes that there would be a constant population of national insurance avoiders who move from one scheme to the next and get in just before another parliamentary announcement. Frankly, that is nonsense.
National Insurance Contributions Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Noakes
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 26 January 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on National Insurance Contributions Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
677 c381-2GC Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:16:37 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_294970
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_294970
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_294970