It is always nice to start a discussion in Committee on a quasi-philosophical basis; I was interested to hear the noble Baroness talking about the morality of tax legislation. That is an element of discussion on this kind of legislation that has exercised much of your Lordships’ time. I feel that when one starts talking about morality and tax regulations, one enters a quagmire from which it is relatively difficult to emerge, much as I am in favour of everybody behaving decently.
The distinction between ““expedient”” and ““reasonable”” is one without a difference. Equally, we should not be concerned on the noble Baroness’s concern about ““appears to the Treasury””. Who else but the Treasury will exercise the judgment on whether something appears either expedient or reasonable? I find her arguments interesting, but not wholly convincing.
National Insurance Contributions Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Newby
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 26 January 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on National Insurance Contributions Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
677 c369GC Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:54:28 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_294952
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_294952
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_294952