Yes, but! I am sure that the advice that the Minister received was given in good faith, but it does not coincide with the advice that we received in the Joint Committee and which we evaluated very carefully. In any case, leaving the convention on one side and going back to the main point that I made at the beginning of my earlier intervention, if we are to take citizenship seriously, we are inadvertently in this Bill, by the back door, introducing two levels of citizenship. Whether a person has citizenship somewhere else or not is not the issue; the issue is what British citizenship means. Some people may be subject to this provision and some may not. Surely that is a distinction in the quality of citizenship—potentially for everyone. That point should be taken very seriously, and I am quite certain that my noble friend will take it very seriously.
Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Judd
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 19 January 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
677 c276GC Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:28:52 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_292915
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_292915
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_292915