Of course he can ascribe a reason. That is why I said that the first letter will not give the person an appointment; it will invite him to make arrangements to make an appointment. The second letter provided for in the procedure is to remind the person of the need to report, to give a suggested appointment time and to say, ““If that is not convenient, can you notify us of another time?””. The second letter provides the person with an opportunity to rearrange the appointment, and the measure comes into play only if there has been no response to the initial notice followed by the reminder.
Identity Cards Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Scotland of Asthal
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 19 December 2005.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Identity Cards Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
676 c1539 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 19:30:05 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_288219
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_288219
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_288219