It seems to me that we are now moving so far from the original motivation for introducing Clause 1, which was the problem with school trips and similar activities undertaken by Guides and Scouts, and so on, that this is becoming another argument for not having Clause 1 at all and for leaving the courts to recognise, as they do, that there are extremely varied circumstances in which it is reasonable not to prevent a risk. Such activities are not necessarily confined to leisure activities or children’s activities or anything of that kind and indeed are so wide that they cannot be defined.
Compensation Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Goodhart
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 15 December 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Compensation Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
676 c213-4GC Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:57:12 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_287436
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_287436
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_287436