The Minister made an excellent case for these amendments. I could not work out what was left with regard to ““connected with”” that could not be covered by ““necessary for””, particularly as regards the phrase ““genuine need”” that the Minister used. You have all these protections with regard to the genuine need of various departments to have this information, so why do you need the wider phrase ““connected with””? The regulations will restrict the measure so the Minister has made an excellent case for these amendments.
Identity Cards Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Earl of Erroll
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 14 December 2005.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Identity Cards Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
676 c1306 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 14:05:45 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_286913
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_286913
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_286913