I do not think that the noble Lord will find that this amendment is necessary. As I have already said on previous groups of amendments, there is only a limited list of information which may be provided in response to a verification application under Clause 14. Organisations will be provided only with the specific information that supports their businesses; that is, only a limited part of the individual’s entry as permitted under Clause 14(1).
In addition, I should make it clear that an individual gives consent to only one verification at a time. You cannot give blanket verification to an agency. You say, ““I will allow you to verify my name and address for this singular transaction””. Those who have that verification will get that information verified to them on that occasion. If they then want another transaction, the individual would have to give consent. It is very similar to the procedure with banks and others: we have to give—I will use the noble Lord’s word—““express”” and informed consent. I hope the noble Lord will see that this amendment would therefore be unnecessary.
Identity Cards Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Scotland of Asthal
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 14 December 2005.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Identity Cards Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
676 c1289-90 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 14:07:52 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_286884
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_286884
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_286884