I thank all Members of the Committee who have contributed to the debate. I also thank the Minister for his responses. I make the general point that, undoubtedly, we will have to return to fees on Report. Clearly a number of concerns and anxieties remain, not least in the mind of the noble Lord, Lord Phillips. As to the narrower point raised by my amendment, I take the Minister’s point that it could be difficult to assess when a requirement to cancel an individual’s card has not been occasioned by his own fault. Indeed, I had not intended the amendment to apply with respect to lost cards. Nevertheless, in the circumstances that I cited—for example, a card reader chewing up a card or corrupting the data on it—I feel it a little mean-spirited for the Government not to be a bit more generous. I shall carefully reflect on the debate but, in the mean time, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
[Amendment No. 177 had been withdrawn from the Marshalled List.]
Clause 13 agreed to.
Clause 14 [Provision of information for verification or otherwise with consent]:
Identity Cards Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Earl of Northesk
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 14 December 2005.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Identity Cards Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
676 c1286 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 14:07:55 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_286873
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_286873
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_286873