I am grateful to the Minister for a reply of clarity which it was perhaps not possible to give on 7 November. I say that in my most charitable way. I assume from what the Minister said today that he just gave a resounding ““Yes”” to the noble Lord, Lord Clarke of Hampstead. In that spirit, I am delighted to beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Clause 8 agreed to.
Clause 9 [ID cards for those compulsorily registered]:
[Amendments Nos. 152 to 160 not moved.]
Clause 9 agreed to.
[Amendment No. 161 not moved.]
Clause 10 [Functions of persons issuing designated documents]:
[Amendment No. 161A not moved.]
Clause 10 agreed to.
Clause 11 [Power to require information for validating Register]:
Identity Cards Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Anelay of St Johns
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 14 December 2005.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Identity Cards Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
676 c1270-1Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 14:07:33 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_286831
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_286831
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_286831