UK Parliament / Open data

Commons Bill [HL]

My Lords, we look on many of the amendments as extremely helpful. I agree with the noble Duke about the verderers. Clearly the Minister is well informed; we too assume that correct decisions have been made so far as the clause is concerned. Amendment No. 50 addresses the vexed question of installations of electronic communications for the purposes of an electronic code network. That is problematic, and it would be interesting to hear the Minister’s views on whether the amendment is the right way to go about it. So far as I am concerned, the jury is out on the matter, and we want to listen to more contributions. Government Amendments Nos. 51 and 52, which concern minerals, seem very reasonable. After ““apply””, government Amendment No. 53 inserts ““(generally)””. Why? What other land are the Government thinking of in that context? The other amendments make sense as well, so I do not want to prolong the proceedings of the House. This raft of amendments is quite constructive.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

676 c262 

Session

2005-06

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords chamber
Back to top