I support the noble Lord with the amendment. We seem to have failed on intellectual argument in our amendments so far, so I shall try flattery on this occasion in the hope that the Minister will accept the amendment. I hope that the Minister is listening out of his left ear if flattery is going to work. Certainly under his regime, the DTI has an extremely good record of consulting stakeholders in relation to all matters under its jurisdiction, but I have yet to be persuaded that the Office of Fair Trading has the same good record. I am persuaded by the argument of the noble Lord, Lord De Mauley, on the basis that the DTI will do a much better consultation job with its stakeholders than the Office of Fair Trading.
Consumer Credit Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Razzall
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 16 November 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Consumer Credit Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
675 c314GC Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:27:45 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_280412
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_280412
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_280412