Identity Cards Bill

Can I assist as to why I do not, respectfully, agree? If we look at the totality of Clause 1(5), we have in relation to subsection 5(f) ““residential statuses previously held by him,”” which are not necessarily referable to residences in the United Kingdom. If we then look at paragraph (i), there is, in terms of residence or any other information,"““information recorded in the Register at his request””." In relation to residence we have at paragraph (b),"““where he resides in the United Kingdom””." That could catch all places at which he resides. I think many of us have the advantage of having more than one home.