I have been interested to hear what the Minister has had to say on the matter. Whether I am recommending the list of options or not, it seems that Clause 29 is to a certain extent the Government’s response to the question of whether there could be prescribed national constitution terms. If we go through this, we will be setting out a potential list for a draft constitution. I am basically in favour of it, although we would look at it in terms of the content. The discussion on moneys will be interesting; we will all be interested in what the Minister has to say on that. Amendment No. 141 was just a probing amendment, so we are glad to hear how the Minister responded. With that, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
[Amendments Nos. 140 and 141 not moved.]
Clause 29 agreed to.
Clause 30 [Functions]:
Commons Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Duke of Montrose
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 2 November 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Commons Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
675 c115-6GC Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:50:30 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_279646
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_279646
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_279646