I am grateful to the noble Baroness for opposing that Clause 28 stand part of the Bill. The clause is particularly odd. We have a constitution—my noble friend has been kind enough to send us all the appropriate regulations—and Clause 28(1) says:"““The appropriate national authority must by regulations””"
do this, that and the other. Then, it goes on under paragraph (3) to state:"““An order under section 25 may also make provision as to the constitution and administration of a commons association””."
In other words, the national authority can tear up the standard constitution and say that it wants something different; or different in different circumstances. So in a sense, what is the point of having a standard constitution? Each commons is different and probably needs a different constitution. I would be most grateful if my noble friend could enlighten me.
Commons Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Williams of Elvel
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 2 November 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Commons Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
675 c111GC Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:49:59 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_279629
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_279629
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_279629