UK Parliament / Open data

Commons Bill [HL]

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Byford (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 2 November 2005. It occurred during Debate on bills and Committee proceeding on Commons Bill [HL].
I speak to Amendment No. 123, which is in this group. I should like clarification on this matter. I accept that the part of the regulations I am seeking to remove says ““may”” and that it makes provision regarding the process of converting the register. However, is this the only Bill—or is it becoming a recurrent event—where the process is defined on the face of the legislation? It seems an unusual step. I am sure that we all recognise and accept that many of our records will be moved on to electronic format, but I have not seen this sort of provision in previous legislation, stating that regulation ““may”” define it. Page 28 of the Explanatory Notes refers to the digitisation of maps for the CROW Act and to the difficulties in transferring the information from old maps. If the Government intend simply to build on the experience gained from the Countryside Agency and the Countryside Council for Wales, the use of the word ““process”” may be too wide. Can the Minister also tell me which part of the Government will be drawing up these regulations and under whose remit it will fall? Does it include anything that goes beyond the description of process included in this part of the Bill?

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

675 c75GC 

Session

2005-06

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords Grand Committee
Back to top