I have some sympathy with the amendment tabled by the noble Earl, Lord Northesk. If we track the drafting of the Bill and look at Clause 1(5), we see that a,"““‘registrable fact’, in relation to an individual, means . . . his identity””."
We look then at subsection (7), which says:"““In this section references to an individual’s identity””,"
include the date of his death. But when you look back at subsection (5)(e) it refers to ““his current residential status””. I am not sure what the residential status is going to be of someone who has died. The drafting really does need cleaning up.
Identity Cards Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Williams of Elvel
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 23 November 2005.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Identity Cards Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
675 c1646-7 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 10:17:57 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_279274
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_279274
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_279274