What an impossible task it is to find an age which everyone agrees can be described as ““old”” or ““older””. Look at this House itself! You might say that anybody over 90 could be described as such, as there are so many youthful people of 80, 70 and 60. I suggest that the Minister has got it about right with 60. But then of course there is the matter of the pension age, which is 65; you could suggest that because of the pension crisis, we should go up to 67 for a retirement age. To put it down as a definite age is not the best way in which to go about it, but I liked the suggestion of my neighbour, the noble Lord, Lord Roberts of Conwy, that we have a more pragmatic approach and that the commissioner could move in when required. But the norm, I would suggest, is 60 or possibly even 65.
Commissioner for Older People (Wales) Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Roberts of Llandudno
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 26 October 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Commissioner for Older People (Wales) Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
674 c371-2GC Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:04:41 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_279105
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_279105
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_279105