Amendment No. 53 seeks to insert into the Bill the words,"““or should be provided by virtue of their entitlement””."
Before going further, I should state that we certainly share the concerns outlined by the noble Lord, Lord Roberts of Conwy, in regard to Amendment No. 46 and the use of the word ““relevant””. We also agree with the words used by the noble Lord in Amendment No. 55.
As to Amendment No. 53, we are concerned about the services required by older people. They have paid their national insurance, their council tax or their rates in the past—they have paid their taxes—and many have received benefits that were targeted. This entitles them to enjoy or make use of regulated services. But I know of instances where older people are unable to access such services, often despite a lifetime of having contributed to the running of those services. How are these older people going to receive the services to which they are entitled, having paid for them during their lifetime?
Commissioner for Older People (Wales) Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Livsey of Talgarth
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 26 October 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Commissioner for Older People (Wales) Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
674 c335GC Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:21:07 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_279009
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_279009
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_279009